
Audience research
Planning retail media audience research with six populations kept apart
Plan retail media audience research in England with distinct buyer populations, ethical recruitment, bounded evidence and explicit decision rules.
Retail media audience research should begin with a decision, not a broad profile of shoppers. An England retailer might need to learn why advertisers reject a placement brief, why agency staff cannot reconcile delivery, or why a customer mistakes paid placement for ordinary merchandising. Those are different questions for different populations.
No research was conducted for this guide. It provides a blank plan for an adult-participant study. A buyer must supply the sampling frame, participant evidence and results, then obtain named ethics, privacy, accessibility, safeguarding and statistical review before publication.
What to take away
- Start retail media audience research with a defined decision, not a broad profile of shoppers.
- Keep six populations separate because each holds different evidence and cannot answer for another.
- Record your sampling frame, exclusions and participant counts so readers can judge what the study represents.
- Participation consent is not automatically the UK GDPR lawful basis, so document the actual basis first.
- Exclude children by default and stop if the question genuinely requires them or adults at risk.
Define the retail-media decision
IAB UK's retail media definition covers retailer or marketplace controlled advertising space, data assets and in-store opportunities. That category boundary helps identify who may know something, but it does not make everyone a research audience.
Write one decision sentence:
We need evidence from [eligible population] about [recent task or event] so [named owner] can decide whether to [change, test, retain or stop] [defined retail-media process] by [review date].
The sentence must identify the retailer or marketplace property, media environment, advertiser exchange and England connection. Keep on-site, off-site and in-store journeys apart because they involve different people and records. State what would change the decision and what evidence would stop the study.
Keep six populations separate
The legal retailer or marketplace controls the relevant property or inventory. Its commercial buyer may commission a media service, while operational staff approve products, creative, access and reporting. These staff are not interchangeable.
Six populations, separate evidence
Retailer commercial buyer
- Decision role
- approves exchange
- Eligible recent event
- reviewed proposition
- Frame owner
- retailer
- Excluded from inference
- shopper attitudes
Advertiser buyer
- Decision role
- accepts or rejects brief
- Eligible recent event
- made documented decision
- Frame owner
- advertiser
- Excluded from inference
- retailer capability
Agency operator
- Decision role
- manages hand-off
- Eligible recent event
- handled named stage
- Frame owner
- agency
- Excluded from inference
- authority not delegated
Platform
- Decision role
- serves or records
- Eligible recent event
- recorded activity
- Frame owner
- platform
- Excluded from inference
- advertiser demand
Data/measurement supplier
- Decision role
- handles inputs/outputs
- Eligible recent event
- processed defined data
- Frame owner
- supplier
- Excluded from inference
- advertiser demand
Consumers and retail staff
- Decision role
- describes task
- Eligible recent event
- experienced placement
- Frame owner
- recruiter
- Excluded from inference
- advertiser demand
An advertiser chooses whether to fund a communication. An agency may plan, create or buy it under delegated authority. A platform serves or records activity. A data or measurement supplier handles defined inputs and outputs. Each organisation can have a buyer, user and approver with different evidence.
Consumers and retail staff may be affected by the advert, controls, tracking or destination. They can describe a task they experienced, but they are not evidence of advertiser demand. Likewise, an advertiser interview cannot establish that a customer recognised a paid placement.
Create a population register with these fields:
| Population | Decision role | Eligible recent event | Frame owner | Excluded from inference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Retailer commercial buyer | approves the exchange | reviewed the defined proposition | retailer | shopper attitudes |
| Advertiser buyer | accepts or rejects a brief | made a documented decision | advertiser | retailer capability |
| Agency operator | manages a delegated hand-off | handled the named campaign stage | agency | authority not delegated |
| Platform or data user | operates a system step | used the exact workflow version | employer or supplier | product performance outside that step |
| Affected adult consumer | encounters the journey | completed or abandoned the defined task | ethically recruited frame | advertiser budget |
| Retail staff member | performs or supports a task | used the process during the study period | retailer | national workforce prevalence |
Do not infer residence, authority, disability, income or technical skill from a name, postcode, job title or public profile.
Build a frame that can answer the question
The GOV.UK Service Manual advises researchers to recruit actual or likely users and explains how recruitment choices create bias in finding user research participants. It is written for government services, so a commercial retail-media team should use it as method guidance rather than a rule that fixes sample size.
Record the target population, source list, frame date, contact provenance and eligibility screener. Record every exclusion. Count eligible, invited, responding, completing and analysed participants separately.
A convenience sample of existing clients describes them but cannot represent all England advertisers, and staff nominated by a manager may withhold criticism, so record who introduced each participant and offer a private response route.
England must be an observable rule. It might mean a person performs the relevant job for an England retail operation or experienced the specified placement in England. A company registered in England does not prove that its respondent worked on the defined event.
Recruit without disguising a sales approach
Research participation, use of personal information and later marketing are separate decisions. The ICO says genuine market research does not count as direct marketing, but a survey that contains promotion or collects details for future campaigns becomes direct marketing in its electronic and telephone marketing guidance. Do not append a sales pitch or move research contacts into a marketing list.
Give each person an accessible information sheet that names the controller, research purpose, activities, observers, recording, recipients, retention, publication plan, contact route and withdrawal process. GOV.UK guidance on informed consent for user research treats participation as voluntary and requires participants to understand what will happen and how their data will be used.
Participation consent is not automatically the UK GDPR lawful basis. The ICO's research principles and grounds guidance makes that distinction. A privacy specialist must document the actual basis, purpose and any additional condition before collection.
Make the instrument answerable
Use a recent, specific event. Ask an advertiser buyer to reconstruct the last in-scope brief they accepted, rejected or returned for clarification. Ask a retailer operator to show the sequence of evidence fields with synthetic records. Ask an affected consumer what they believed was paid and what action they thought a price or control would take.
Put neutral factual questions before opinions. Record the exact question version, order, interviewer prompt and materials shown. Separate what the participant said, what the researcher observed, the analyst's interpretation and what remains unknown. Do not insert a real campaign, customer order or account into a research prototype unless the owner has specifically authorised that use.
The Government Social Research Profession's ethical assurance guidance identifies sound conduct, specific informed consent, enabling participation and minimising harm as separate principles. Its remit is government research, but those questions make a useful ethics review for a commercial project.
Plan accessibility, incentives and safeguarding
Ask about participation adjustments without requiring a diagnosis. Offer usable information and consent formats, remote or in-person routes, breaks and communication support where needed. The government guide to running sessions with disabled people says researchers should speak to the participant directly and avoid assumptions about what they can do or feel.
Record any incentive before recruitment, who receives it, when it is given and whether it could exert pressure. It pays for time; it does not buy a favourable answer or quotation.
This plan excludes children by default. If the question genuinely requires children or adults at risk of harm, stop. Assign a safeguarding lead, obtain a project-specific ethics route, define responsible-adult involvement, safe disclosure handling and withdrawal, and use age-appropriate materials. Do not infer vulnerability from shopping or campaign data.
Control the research data
The ICO's research provisions guidance is under review following legal changes. It says its examples are not complete compliance cases. Treat it as a current, qualified source and recheck it before fieldwork and publication.
Create a data map for recruitment details, screeners, notes, recordings, transcripts, incentives and analysis outputs. For each item, record purpose, source, access, recipient, retention, deletion and correction route. Keep contact details away from response data where possible. The GOV.UK guide to managing research data and participant privacy recommends collecting the minimum recruitment information and anonymising public extracts.
If a survey or transcription supplier is proposed, record its exact legal entity, service, data role, subprocessors, transfers, access controls, retention and export. A privacy page is evidence of a statement, not proof of the buyer's configuration. NCSC supplier assurance questions provide a starting point for access, incident, data and recovery evidence.
Analyse without manufacturing prevalence
Prepare the analysis plan before reading answers. Define codes, who applies them, how disagreements are resolved and which responses are excluded. Preserve missing answers and withdrawals rather than treating them as negative responses. For every proportion, show the numerator, denominator, population, field dates and uncertainty.
Interview themes explain the analysed sample, not how common a view is across England. A survey needs a defensible frame and response assessment before anyone calls it representative.
The UK Statistics Authority's Code of Practice for Statistics 3.0 gives current quality principles for suitable sources, transparent methods, limitations and uncertainty. Applying them voluntarily does not make commercial research official statistics.
Ask participants to verify any quotation and context proposed for publication. Prefer paraphrased, anonymised findings when a distinctive role, retailer or incident could identify someone. Keep a correction log and remove data when the approved withdrawal or deletion route requires it.
Make a bounded decision
The final evidence table should show the decision question, eligible population, frame coverage, invitations, responses, exclusions, missingness, finding, contrary evidence and confidence. The owner may proceed to a synthetic test, revise the proposition, commission more research or stop.
Do not merge samples to create a larger-looking audience. Retailer staff, advertiser buyers and consumers answer different questions. Keep the page on publication hold until the named research, ethics, privacy, accessibility, safeguarding and statistical reviewers can trace every public statement back to an approved source and an appropriate population.
Before you act
- Write one decision sentence naming the owner and review date.
- Build a population register before recruiting anyone.
- Record frame date, screener, exclusions and participant counts.
- Keep research contacts out of marketing lists.
- Document the lawful basis with a privacy specialist.
- Assign a safeguarding lead if children are involved.
Common questions
Why should on-site, off-site and in-store journeys be kept apart?
The article says they involve different people and records, so mixing them would blur who actually knows something. Each journey has its own eligible population, decision role and recent event, which the population register is designed to capture separately before any recruitment begins.
Can a convenience sample of existing clients represent all England advertisers?
No. The article states that a convenience sample of existing clients can describe those clients but cannot represent all England advertisers. It also warns that staff nominated by a manager may withhold criticism, so record who introduced each participant and offer a private response route.
What must an accessible information sheet tell each participant?
It must name the controller, research purpose, activities, observers, recording, recipients, retention, publication plan, contact route and withdrawal process. GOV.UK guidance on informed consent treats participation as voluntary and requires participants to understand what will happen and how their data will be used.
In this guide
- Retail Media Target Audience Data: A Source and Frame AuditAudit retail media target audience data with named source records, frame counts, UK data-permission checks and a review date to retire stale specifications.
- Retail media buyer personas as evidence cards, with the stereotype fields removed and a worked exampleBuild retail media buyer personas as evidence cards: the field table, a completed illustrative example, stereotype fields removed, and ICO data minimisation and GOV.UK research guidance applied.
- Six ways to interview retail media customers without inventing a single participantCompare six retail media customer interview methods for England with ethical recruitment, evidence boundaries and no invented participants or findings.
- Retail media survey tools: a planning and test frameworkFramework for retail media survey tools: define a study and check consent, accessibility, security, exports and supplier evidence; no product results.
- An evidence ledger for retail media competitors that separates facts from supplier claimsResearch retail media competitors in England with a source-led evidence ledger that separates entity facts, supplier claims, buyer evidence and unknowns.



