
Reviews
Which Edinburgh and Glasgow firms handle retail media measurement?
Retail media measurement Edinburgh Glasgow: how data firms in both cities handle attribution, Scottish Government statistics and IAB UK standards.
What to take away
- Edinburgh names with published measurement capabilityBlend360, Storm ID and Mallard.
- Glasgow namesMaterial, Frame and Story, strongest in grocery media planning.
- Ask any of the six for a Scotland-only case study with holdout detail and a written method.
- Fees come as a scoping exercise, project fee, retainer or day rate. No Scottish rate card exists.
Edinburgh firms and what they measure
Blend360 is a data science and analytics consultancy in Edinburgh. Its published methods are marketing mix modelling and incrementality testing, so it splits sales into base, media and external factors.
Storm ID is an Edinburgh data and digital consultancy. It publishes work in data engineering and analytics delivery, and builds the pipelines joining retailer sales data to campaign exposure.
Mallard is an Edinburgh data and marketing consultancy. Segmentation and propensity modelling are its published strengths.
For platform-reported numbers versus measured ones, the retail media metrics walkthrough defines each metric from ad request to incremental sale.
Glasgow firms and what they measure
Glasgow agencies sit closer to grocery and shopper media, so briefs there often start with the media plan.
Material works across Glasgow and London on retail and grocery media planning. Shopper insight is a published strength, applied to campaign measurement linking in-store behaviour to the plan.
Frame covers media planning, creative and campaign analytics, so one team can plan the buy and report on it.
Story is a brand and content agency with campaign measurement in its published mix, but it is not a measurement specialist.
The named firms side by side
| Firm | Base | Stated method relevant to retail media |
|---|---|---|
| Blend360 | Edinburgh | Marketing mix modelling, incrementality testing |
| Storm ID | Edinburgh | Data engineering, analytics delivery |
| Mallard | Edinburgh | Segmentation, propensity modelling |
| Material | Glasgow | Retail and grocery media planning, shopper insight |
| Frame | Glasgow | Media planning, campaign analytics |
| Story | Glasgow | Brand strategy, content, campaign measurement |
That table records published capability, not campaign results. Ask each firm for a named project, its holdout design and the data sources joined.
Attribution methods and what each one credits
Last-click credits the final click and reconciles with platform reports, but over-credits that touch.
View-through credits a sale to an ad seen but not clicked. It needs a defined window and a control group.
Marketing mix modelling estimates each channel's contribution from historical sales and media data. It suits quarterly planning and struggles with small campaigns.
Incrementality testing compares exposed and unexposed shoppers, often using a holdout. It costs the most and comes closest to a causal answer.
The attribution methods comparison sets click-based and view-based routes side by side without crowning a winner.
Retail media attribution methods
Last-click
- What it credits
- Final click
- Main strength
- Simple to reconcile
- Main weakness
- Over-credits last touch
View-through
- What it credits
- Seen, not clicked
- Main strength
- Works for display
- Main weakness
- Needs window and control
Marketing mix modelling
- What it credits
- Channel contribution
- Main strength
- Suits quarterly planning
- Main weakness
- Struggles with small campaigns
Incrementality testing
- What it credits
- Exposed vs unexposed
- Main strength
- Closest to causal
- Main weakness
- Costs most to run
Agree the metric definitions before the campaign starts. Metrics fixed afterwards tend to flatter the supplier.
Example: rebuilding a four-week campaign measurement
The figures below are illustrative, not a real case.
Rebuilding a four-week campaign measurement
- A Scottish grocery advertiser spends GBP 40,000 on a four-week retail media campaign; the platform reports GBP 120,000 of attributed sales.
- A Glasgow agency rebuilds the measurement, matching exposed and unexposed shoppers and setting a seven-day view-through window.
- It holds back 10 per cent of the target audience as a control.
- The lift comes out smaller and more defensible, and the next buy asks the platform for a holdout.
Fees, scope and what a first project costs
No firm in this list publishes a Scottish rate card. Retail media measurement is quoted as a scoping exercise, a project fee, a monthly retainer or a day rate.
A scoping piece covers the question, the data sources, the attribution method and the validation route, and it is the cheapest way to test a supplier.
Fee levels move with data access and holdout size. The UK retail media agency fee guide explains how UK agencies structure those charges.
Scottish figures and the rules that apply
Scotland's Census 2022 recorded 5.44 million people, including about 620,000 in Glasgow City and about 515,000 in the City of Edinburgh.
The Statistics and research - gov.scot collection carries further Scottish Government figures on population and business for sizing catchments.
Measurement standards sit at UK level. The Our story | IAB UK page explains the IAB UK's role in those standards.
Joining campaign data to sales data brings the Data protection principles - guidance and resources | ICO into play.
Common questions
Who handles retail media measurement in Edinburgh and Glasgow?
Edinburgh: Blend360, Storm ID and Mallard. Glasgow: Material, Frame and Story.
Which attribution method should a Scottish advertiser choose?
There is no single best one. Incrementality testing gives the strongest causal read at the highest cost.
Is there a Scotland-only retail media benchmark?
Ask any supplier for one. Where none exists, UK figures and IAB UK standards are the normal reference.



